=== Proposal 1 === Sofie and Linus
We have come to the conclusion that the different governments in the world need to collect and send money to support and help the other not so rich countries in the world so they can get ready for the global warming.
There are very many countries that have already problems with the global warming and we think we should help as many people as we can so instead of trying to help the worst countries first we will help the countries that have the highest possibility to recover fastest.
It’s not that we don’t intend to help the poorest and the countries in the most need of help.
But we do it order of those who are the easiest to save because of that we can save the most people in the shortest amount of time and if we begin now we
We have come to another conclusion that is that we have is the high levels of co2 in the rich countries that have an industry because they insert out an amount of co2 in the air that tree can take care of so it create cracks and wound in the atmosphere and in the ozone layer.
With this damage and cracks in the atmosphere and the ozone layer we put ourselves in danger to the uv-radiation we think out of our point of view we should cut back now when we have chance to hinder this effect. So the temperatures don’t rise and we won’t have an accelerated global warming.
=== Proposal 2 === Erik, Firat and emelie
We think that if we’re going to fix the global warming problem the politicians all over the world have to take more responsibility. Global warming needs to be prioritized among politicians and they should run their politics through an environmental point of view. Politicians all over the world should also cooperate, so that every country is involved in working towards solving the global warming problem. If the politicians raise taxes on petrol and cutting taxes for train and bus trips so more people will be affected by it and choose to stand above the car. Emission limits of hazardous substances will be reduced. Politicians should also set higher demands for their countries, countries that are not willing should somehow be forced or rewarded if they cooperate and make progress.
We think that maybe instead of using wave power which is very expensive relative to the amount of energy you gain, we should use nuclear power even more, because it’s been proven that through a global warming perspective it’s a very good power source. However there are risks, but if we globally develop nuclear power to make it safer than it already is today we think that it could be worth the risk.
=== Proposal 3 ===Niklas and Therese
We all know that the technology today is an environment issue and that we all need to improve the environment. Here we have some suggestions of how we can improve the technology:
First of all the responsibility is on the authorities and the industries of the country. If these hold their responsibility by developing the technology in a more "green" way, then we think that it’s up to the individual person to use this developed technology.
We also think that all countries governments should take more responsibility of developing the nuclear power plant (NPP) -technology, which is a way who can produce energy.
Another very important question is the gasoline. We think that the government should improve the public transportation vehicles technologies and increase the price of the gasoline so more people will go by train and busses etc. This will in a long sight improve the co2 emissions.