Difference between revisions of "Comenius talk:Solutions - Geographical aspects/France/Group 1"

From Wiki de Vega
Jump to: navigation, search
(For Proposal 1)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
[[File:Es.gif|15px]] [[User:Jaume|Jaume]] 12:40, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 
[[File:Es.gif|15px]] [[User:Jaume|Jaume]] 12:40, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
I'm agree with the proposal 1 because it is a good idea to get the water that cover the mountains are not wasted and can be used for supplies for human use, but I think it is little difficult to create these reserves of water in the bases of mountains and glaciers, the large size that would have these structures and the large amount of money it would cost to construction.--[[File:Es.gif|15px]]  [[User:Vicent|Vicent]] 09:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
  
 
The proposal on the water supply seems to be very good, and is an idea to reduce serious water shortages as these reservoirs serve to supply the population. To build these lakes near glaciers and lakes need a lot of money and it would be necessary  that  governments implement these projects. Your proposal reduces the problems caused by the melting of the glaciers. <br>[[File:Es.gif|15px]]  [[User:Carla|Carla]] 12:54, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 
The proposal on the water supply seems to be very good, and is an idea to reduce serious water shortages as these reservoirs serve to supply the population. To build these lakes near glaciers and lakes need a lot of money and it would be necessary  that  governments implement these projects. Your proposal reduces the problems caused by the melting of the glaciers. <br>[[File:Es.gif|15px]]  [[User:Carla|Carla]] 12:54, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:24, 26 March 2010

For Proposal 1

Yes, but when they build these dams will have to do it somewhere, to be drowned by water and will miss the life they had.

Es.gif Jaume 12:40, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

I'm agree with the proposal 1 because it is a good idea to get the water that cover the mountains are not wasted and can be used for supplies for human use, but I think it is little difficult to create these reserves of water in the bases of mountains and glaciers, the large size that would have these structures and the large amount of money it would cost to construction.--Es.gif Vicent 09:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

The proposal on the water supply seems to be very good, and is an idea to reduce serious water shortages as these reservoirs serve to supply the population. To build these lakes near glaciers and lakes need a lot of money and it would be necessary that governments implement these projects. Your proposal reduces the problems caused by the melting of the glaciers.
Es.gif Carla 12:54, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Es.gif Patricia 11:46, 23 March 2010 (UTC)I agree with proposal two, but I would explain how we can recycle, how we can change our thinking, may be through environmental lessons, advertising campaigns, people awareness...

Es.gif Patricia 11:59, 23 March 2010 (UTC)I don't agree with proposal 3, ski resorts have existed many years ago, they did not affect the global warming, there are a lot of things that affect more the global warming than the ski resorts. If the ski resorts are closed because going there, cars pollute a lot, It should also be prohibited long distances travelled by cars,or having an accountant of kilometers and the gobern will control you --Amenaqaderi|Amenaqaderi]] 19:24, 23 March 2010 (UTC)Nl.gif Amenaqaderi Our question: Group 1: How will you do that reservoir?


I like your two first proposals, but i do not like the solution for the ice melting in the mountains, that you propose in the 3rd paragraph(you say, that ski resorts must be closed), but i do not think that this will help to stop the ice melting.--Es.gif Carol 08:27, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[[


--Es.gif Sonia 4A 09:06, 26 March 2010 (UTC) I think it good idea to make a reservoir for fresh water does not leak into the rivers and lakes. But that should have special grants to create the reservoir.