Comenius talk:Solutions - Geographical aspects/France/Group 2

From Wiki de Vega
Revision as of 10:51, 20 April 2010 by Érika (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

--Amenaqaderi|Amenaqaderi]] 19:27, 23 March 2010 (UTC)Nl.gif Amenaqaderi Our queation: Group 2 It’s is a good plan, because we think the plan will help to hold the nature clean.

Don´t you mean that the glaciers on the mountains will disappear, not the mountains? Your proposals were slighty short, we thought. We think that you are capabel of developing your proprosals. But it was over all good!--Matilda SWEDEN 10:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposal 1: We think thats a good solution. Proposal 2:Very good solution for the problem. Proposal 3: it’s a good The fourth proposal is not very safe, but it is possible that if developed further, we may better understand your idea, and compare it with the restidea but we don’t think it happen. Nl.gif Sandravanduyvenvoorde

--Es.gif   Andoni 11:38, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

About the propolsal 4, I can bring the idea of build floating lily pads, which are cities that float in the sea and solve the problem of rising sea and the massification of people in one place. The city, by Vicent Cellabaut can accommodate 50,000 people, is supplied with their own crops, generates its own energy and can move from one place to another, this solution would put the probability of tsunamis, tidal waves...

Lilypad1.jpg

I think it's the best solution.












PROPOSAL 1: Hello. I don't think that it's a good idea, because... how are you going to transport that water to the poorest countries? By boat? By Truck? That will be a lot of work and it will contaminate.

--Es.gif Noelia 07:17, 16 April 2010 (UTC)


I think that the fourth proposal isn't very save, it seems very complicated to perform, and I think that isn't the most appropriate.--Es.gif Érika 10:49, 20 April 2010 (UTC)