Comenius talk:Solutions - Geographical aspects/Sweden/Group 3

From Wiki de Vega
Revision as of 09:37, 26 March 2010 by Vicent (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

The work is very good. I find it very interesting how the floating houses, since it could be a good solution. Another solution that I also like is to purify the salt water fresh water for living things.--Davinia 08:22, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Not a bad idea if the sea level rises considerably, but instead of building floating homes they should build underwater structures that made serve as bases for the houses. Vicent 09:22, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

I think that proposal 1 is a bit surreal.This measure would very extreme in advanced cases.From my point of view I think we have to base on the present and not look ahead, as if this were to happen. --Es.gif Francisco 09:09, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

I see a ban nonsense emit carbon dioxide into the water. Because if you throw in the water should be allowed to imitate all gases in the atmosphere, and no two solutions are accurate. What we should do is stop emitting carbon dioxide in general.--Es.gif Sonia 4A 09:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Reforestation is a very good solution from the geographical point of view because they're essential to stop global warming and climate change. Floating houses are a original idea but I think it contructing them could be very difficult to carry out. --Es.gif Rafael 09:29, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

In my opinion, reforestation it's a good way to keep the nature. Because without trees the deserts are going to be bigger and most animals will disapear. In addition there will be earth movements and flooding.